Summary of Policies and Proposals for Housing
Adopted Plan Deposit Draft |
|
Policy: |
|
H1 Structure Plan housing
requirements.
|
(H1) |
H2 Housing development in
towns. |
(H2) |
H3 Housing development in
villages.
|
(H3) |
H4 Provision for affordable
housing in larger schemes. |
(H5) |
H5 Affordable housing in the
countryside. |
(H6) |
H6 A regular supply of housing
land.
|
(H7) |
H7 Restricting housing development
unrelated to the needs of the countryside. |
(H8) |
H8 Replacement dwellings in
the countryside. |
(H10) |
H9 Conversion
of rural buildings to dwellings. |
(H11) |
H10 Dwellings
for key agricultural workers. |
(H12) |
H11 Residential
caravans and other mobile homes. |
(H13) |
H12 Gypsy
sites. |
(n/a) |
H13 Design
and layout of housing development. |
(H14) |
H14 A range
of house types to meet different accommodation needs. |
(H15) |
H15 Development
to reflect local characteristics. |
(H16) |
H16 Protecting
existing residential amenity.
|
(H17) |
H17 Keeping residential development
away from pollution. |
(H18) |
H18 Extensions to existing
dwellings. |
(H19) |
H19 Accommodation for special
family needs. |
(H20) |
Deleted Small scale development abutting Settlement
Boundaries. |
(H4) |
Deleted Development within clusters of rural dwellings.
|
(H9) |
Proposal: |
|
2 Housing development
at Hill House Farm, Needham Market. |
(7) |
3 Housing development at
Victoria Hill, Eye. |
(36) |
4 Housing development at
Sackvylle Street, Debenham. |
(8) |
Provision for Housing |
|
2.3.1
The town and country planning system is required by the Government
to provide an adequate and continuous supply of land for housing,
taking account of market demand. The planning system must also
ensure that established environmental policies are maintained and,
if necessary, strengthened. This conforms to the principle of sustainable
growth. The housing policies and proposals in the
Local Plan are intended to provide for future housing needs in
Mid Suffolk whilst minimising their impact on the environment of
its towns, villages and countryside. |
Planning for sustainable growth. |
2.3.2 The
Housing objectives of the Local Plan are:-
-
to make provision for an adequate supply of development land
in the Plan area to meet the housing requirements set out in
the County Structure Plan
-
to identify the most suitable locations for new housing development
having regard to market demand, the economic provision of services
and the importance of conserving the best natural and man-made
features of the Plan area
-
to protect the special character of Mid Suffolk and to maintain
the separate identity of its towns, villages and the countryside
-
to preserve and enhance the character and amenity of existing
residential areas
-
to encourage a high standard of design, layout and landscaping
in new housing development
-
to encourage a mix of house types and accommodation in new development
to cater for a variety of housing needs
-
to encourage the provision of affordable housing
to meet local needs.
|
|
2.3.3
Many of the housing proposals will be implemented by the private
sector with privately-owned housing accounting for about 85 per
cent of the housing stock in the District in 1992. The District
Council retains an important role in providing for particular housing
needs, either directly or increasingly by enabling other organisations,
such as Housing Associations, to make provision. Priorities and
needs for public investment in housing are set out in the annual Housing
Investment Programme and Strategy produced by the District
Council and submitted to the Department of the Environment.
|
A total housing stock of 33,570 dwellings in 1992. |
Changes in Population |
|
2.3.4
The population of Mid Suffolk has grown by about 10.0 percent over
the period 1981-1991, compared to an increase of 5.3 percent for
the County of Suffolk and a decrease of 0.1 percent for the whole
of England and Wales. Over the Plan period, the population of Mid
Suffolk is expected to grow, but at a lower rate. The predicted
population for Mid Suffolk is 90,900 by the year 2006. The growth
in population partly results from an increase in the number of
births over deaths, but the main factor is net migration into the
area. Migration is influenced by the availability of jobs, the
differential in house prices between areas of the country and the
perception of the quality of life an area offers as a place to
live, work or to enjoy in retirement. |
Population growth through inward
migration.
|
2.3.5
National population trends point towards a large reduction in the
number of school leavers and young adults during the 1990's. There
is also an increase in the over 75 age group. However, with migration
into the area, changes in the balance of the population will be
less marked in Mid Suffolk. There has been a trend towards the
formation of smaller households. This has resulted from reduced
family size, divorce, single parent families and a greater number
of young and elderly people living separately from their families.
Even without population growth, there is a need for additional
housing because of the formation of smaller households, including
the need for low cost 'starter' homes for young people and sheltered
accommodation for the elderly. The annual growth in the number
of small households is expected to slow down during the Plan period. |
Housing needs
arising from smaller
households.
|
Meeting the Housing Target for Mid Suffolk |
|
2.3.6
Mid Suffolk will continue to be an attractive place for setting
up home and new housing will be required for both the existing
population and for people moving into the area. Guidance on the
scale of growth is set out in Regional Planning Guidance
for East Anglia published by the Secretary of State for
the Environment in 1991 and in the Suffolk County Structure Plan
(Alterations 1, 2 and 3). The Structure Plan sets out the number
of houses required in Mid Suffolk between 1988 and 2006.
|
Guidance on the scale of growth. |
STRUCTURE
PLAN HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
POLICY
H1
PROVISION
IS MADE FOR ABOUT 7,590 DWELLINGS IN THE PERIOD BETWEEN 1988
AND 2006 IN MID SUFFOLK.
|
|
2.3.7
In the late 1980's an unprecedented upsurge in the housing market
doubled the rate of house building and brought forward a large
number of planning permissions for new housing in Mid Suffolk.
Between 1988 and 1992 the housing stock in the District increased
by about 3,100 dwellings, an average of 775 dwellings per year.
For the Local Plan period 1992 to 2006 a further 4,490 dwellings
are required in order to meet Structure Plan requirements. |
|
2.3.8 Five Year Supply of Housing Land - The District
Planning Authority is required by the Government to ensure at all
times there is at least a five year supply of land available for
housing development in the District. There is already a considerable
amount of land with planning permission for housing and further
requirements will be met by land allocations identified in the Local
Plan. At mid 1992, there were existing planning permissions for
3,200 dwellings.
|
Ensuring a 5 year supply of housing land. |
2.3.9
Not all planning permissions will immediately be taken up and some
may be allowed to lapse. These potential 'losses', by permissions
not being taken up, are likely to be more than compensated for
by new permissions which will be granted during the Plan period.
A comparison of planning permissions granted and the actual number
of houses built between 1981 and 1991 indicates a take up rate
of about 80 per cent. Many of the new planning permissions will
come forward on small sites not specifically identified in the
Local Plan. |
|
Note: Sites for housing will only
be shown as land allocations (or proposals) by the Local Plan
where the development of the site will bring forward at least
10 dwellings. |
|
|
2.3.10 The Settlement Boundaries defined for
towns and villages contain parcels of land which may be suitable for
development or redevelopment. It is not possible to predict the rate
at which these sites might become available. This will depend on market
forces and the decisions of individual landowners. |
The contribution of windfall sites
to future housing provision. |
2.3.11 The mid 1992 figure of outstanding planning
permissions for 3,200 houses comprises 59 per cent on sites for 10
or more dwellings and 41 per cent on small sites with less than 10
dwellings. Over the 10 years 1981-1991 about one third of all houses
built in Mid Suffolk were in small developments (consisting of less
than 10 houses). |
|
2.3.12 An allowance for small scale windfall
development, which cannot be properly quantified
in advance, has been included in the projected housing development
shown in Table 2 below. The figure shown takes account
of the past rate of development. This is regarded as a conservative
estimate when compared to the situation between 1981-1991. This period
was, however, a boom period for house-building. The amount of windfall
development will be monitored during the first review of the Plan. |
|
2.3.13 A large part of the housing requirement
up to 2006 can be met by existing planning permissions and the development
of small windfall sites, leaving a relatively small amount to be
provided by specific allocations in the Local Plan. Nevertheless
it is important to provide for an element of choice in line with
the Government's requirements to acknowledge market demand and to
allow for unforeseen delays in the development of the larger housing
sites identified. Table 2 therefore shows a total
for proposed allocations in excess of that theoretically required.
The allocated sites comprise major development at Stowmarket, which
is of strategic importance to development in the A14 corridor, and
smaller allocations at Needham Market, Debenham and a number of
villages.
|
Providing for a continuing
supply of housing land. |
2.3.14 Housing at Defence Establishments
- Wattisham Airfield is a military base close to the village of
Great Bricett. Part of the base also lies within the boundary of
Babergh District Council. The base has a substantial number of houses
for its military personnel and although it has special status, a
Settlement Boundary has been defined to distinguish the built up
domestic area of the base, and approved extensions, from the surrounding
countryside. The Suffolk County Structure Plan (incorporating Alterations
1, 2 and 3) includes policy guidance on residential development
to meet military needs (Policy CS7). The future military use of
Wattisham has been secured following a recent decision by the Ministry
of Defence and therefore its housing is not available on the open
market and has not been included in Table 2. |
Housing associated withWattisham
Airfield. |
|
|
TABLE 2
HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 1992-2006
MID SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN AREA |
|
|
NO. OF DWELLINGS |
ITEM A |
TOTAL HOUSING STOCK AT 2006 (SUFFOLK COUNTY STRUCTURE PLAN, ALTERATION
NO. 2)
|
38,060
|
ITEM B
|
EXISTING HOUSING STOCK MID
1992
|
33,570
|
ITEM C
|
DWELLINGS REQUIRED (A-B)
1992-2006 |
4,490
|
ITEM D
|
EXISTING PLANNING PERMISSIONS
MID 1992 (3,200) DISCOUNTED BY 20% (-640)
|
2,560
|
ITEM E
|
ADDITIONAL DWELLINGS TO BE
PROVIDED (C-D)
1992-2006 |
1,930
|
ITEM F
|
PROPOSED ALLOCATIONS
|
1,255
|
ITEM G
|
ALLOWANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT
ON SMALL SITES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE LOCAL PLAN IN ADDITION TO THOSE
WITH PLANNING PERMISSION, (NAMELY WINDFALL SITES INCLUDING INFILL,
CONVERSIONS AND CHANGES OF USE)
|
450
|
ITEM H
|
PLANNING PERMISSIONS 1992-95,
DISCOUNTED FOR RENEWALS AND NON TAKE-UP
|
426
|
|
'OVER-ALLOCATION' (F+G+H-E)
|
201
|
Explanatory Notes:
|
|
ITEM A
Suffolk County Structure Plan (Alterations 1 and
2) indicates the targeted scale of change in housing
stock in each district up to 2006.
ITEM B
Existing housing stock at mid 1992 is based on Suffolk County Council
estimates. At mid 1988, the base date of the County Structure Plan,
the housing stock in Mid Suffolk was estimated to be 30,470. Between
mid 1988 and mid 1992 about 3,100 dwellings have been built in Mid
Suffolk Local Plan area, an average of 775 dwellings per year. (See
paragraph 2.3.7).
ITEM C
Dwellings required over the Local Plan period 1992 to 2006 average
approximately 320 dwellings per year. ITEM D
Existing planning permissions include outstanding
outline and full planning permission for housing as well as dwellings
under construction, at mid 1992. Ministry of Defence married quarters
housing is not included. Significant planning permissions granted
since mid 1992 and prior to the deposit of the Local Plan include
outline permissions for about 150 dwellings at Great Blakenham and
for 36 dwellings at Woolpit. Sites allocated in the deposit draft
of the Local Plan, at Beyton, Claydon (Exeter Road) and Coddenham
have subsequently been granted planning permission and a planning
permission at Eye has expired and been replaced by a Local Plan
allocation.
ITEM E
Past experience over a ten year period indicates that about 80% of
planning permission are taken up. (See paragraph 2.3.9).
ITEM F
Proposed allocations are described under Proposals
2, 3, 4, 5 and 26.
ITEM G
The allowance for development on 'windfall' sites refers to small
sites for less than 10 dwellings. It is intended that large scale
proposals for housing development will take place on sites identified
in the Local Plan. However, in addition to small scale windfall development,
it is possible that other larger sites (for 10 or more dwellings)
may come forward for development in towns as a result of redevelopment
or conversion. No allowance has been shown in Table 2 for possible
large windfall sites but two significant planning permissions, granted
after the mid 1992 base date of the Local Plan and
prior to the Local Plan's Deposit, are referred to in the Notes above,
under Item D. |
|
Settlement Policy |
|
2.3.15 The Structure Plan's strategy for
housing growth looks to direct population and employment to selected
locations along the A14 corridor at Ipswich, Bury St. Edmunds and
Stowmarket. The basis of this strategy is to allow for growth but
to relieve pressure on smaller towns and villages, and to minimise
travelling and servicing costs. The idea behind a Settlement
Policy is to set out planning guidelines for the scale
of housing development appropriate for towns, villages and the countryside.
In particular, new housing development should be sympathetic
in scale and character to the existing form and pattern of settlements
in the Plan area. Most larger scale housing development
in the form of estates will be directed to the towns. In villages,
most housing will be in the form of small groups of dwellings or
infilling of a small undeveloped plot. Housing for general needs
should not take place in the countryside.
|
A scale of development appropriate
to its surroundings. |
2.3.16 Detailed policies and proposals
for housing development in towns, villages and the countryside are
set out in this Local Plan. They are intended to create the best
physical and social development of communities by encouraging a
scale and location of development that can be economically serviced
and that will make the best use of existing investment. They look
to ensure that housing is well related to employment opportunities
and main transport routes and that the countryside is protected
for its landscape, agricultural, wildlife and recreational value.
|
Making sure that resources are not
used wastefully.
|
2.3.17 Throughout the Mid Suffolk Local
Plan, the following definitions apply when describing types of housing
development:-
Estate - a development based
on a new estate road, often requiring increased capacity to local
infrastructure, and which because of the scale and density of
its layout needs to be carefully related to the surrounding landscape
and the existing form and pattern of a settlement. The appropriate
size of an estate will be relative to the town or village where
it is to be built but will usually be 10 or more dwellings.
Larger Group - development
normally served by a shared road, perhaps forming a cul-de-sac,
with a single access onto the existing road system and based on
a group of 6 to 9 dwellings well related to each other and their
surroundings.
Small Group - up to 5 dwellings,
well related to each other and their surroundings and utilising
an existing road frontage or shared driveway or court.
Infill - the filling of a small
undeveloped plot in an otherwise built up frontage. A 'small undeveloped
plot' is one which would normally be filled by 1 or 2 dwellings.
If a plot can accommodate more than 2 dwellings the development
is no longer regarded as infilling.
|
Recognisable types of housing development.
|
Note: The definition of
'infill' should be read in conjunction with Policy SB2 and
Policy SB3. Even where a gap is small, it may be desirable
to retain it as an essential feature in the existing pattern
of development. |
|
|
Towns |
|
2.3.18 Proposals for new housing development
and most housing estates will be located at towns or larger villages
which have a range of facilities and services. Stowmarket with a
population of 13,230 at mid 1991 is Mid Suffolk's largest town.
The historic market towns of Needham Market, Eye and Debenham are
much smaller, each with populations of less than 5,000 at mid 1991.
In fact there are a number of larger villages in Mid Suffolk with
populations similar in size to these small towns, for example the
villages of Bramford, Claydon with Barham, Elmswell, Stowupland
and Thurston.
2.3.19 The scale of housing development will be consistent with
protecting the character and landscape setting of Mid Suffolk's
towns. Whilst there will be opportunities through redevelopment
or land assembly for some estate development
on sites within the settlement boundaries of towns, most large scale
proposals for housing will take place on sites identified in the
Local Plan and abutting the existing built up area. |
Planning for a scale of growth
appropriate to Mid suffolk's towns..
|
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN TOWNS |
|
POLICY H2
WITHIN TOWNS, THE SCALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
CONSISTENT WITH PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF THE SETTLEMENT AND LANDSCAPE
SETTING OF THE TOWN. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WILL BE IN THE FORM OF
INFILLING, GROUPS OF DWELLINGS OR, IN APPROPRIATE CASES, ESTATES.
PROPOSALS FOR ESTATE DEVELOPMENT OF 10 OR MORE DWELLINGS ON LAND
ABUTTING THE BUILT UP AREAS OF TOWNS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS
IDENTIFIED IN THE LOCAL PLAN.
WITHIN MID SUFFOLK, STOWMARKET, NEEDHAM MARKET, DEBENHAM
AND EYE ARE DEFINED AS TOWNS. |
|
Note: This policy should be read
in conjunction with Policies H13, H14 and H15 which refer to housing
mix and density. |
|
2.3.20 Stowmarket is
the largest town in Mid Suffolk. The town is expected to accommodate
a significant proportion of the District's housing development
through the plan period. Proposal 26 sets
out the number of houses expected while Proposal 27 designates
the area concerned as a Strategic Development Area. These proposals
and their reasoned justification are set out in Section
2.10: Stowmarket Strategic Development Area (SDA). This
chapter reflects the District Planning Authority's wish to see
a comprehensive approach to Stowmarket's future development and
the need to allocate the maximum amount of housing in larger urban
areas especially where they are well serviced by rail and other
forms of public transport. |
Accommodating a strategic level
of housing growth at Stowmarket.
|
2.3.21 Needham
Market is a small market town two miles south of Stowmarket.
In terms of the number of houses, Needham Market doubled in size
between 1971 and 1981 with large estate development on the north
and south sides of the town. The District Planning Authority
did not allocate land for further housing development at Needham
Market during the 1980's to allow the town to properly assimilate
its previous growth and to wait for facilities and services to
be upgraded to cater for the increased population. In consequence,
the rate of housing growth was slower between 1981 and 1991,
averaging 50 new dwellings per year. |
Assimilating
growth after a period of rapid change.
|
2.3.22
Local facilities have improved with a new community centre, a replacement
primary school, the development of countryside recreation facilities
at Needham Lake and additional employment, following extensions
to the Lion Barn Industrial Estate. However, there are constraints
to the future development of the town.
2.3.23
The railway forms a barrier to eastward expansion and there are
long-standing policies to protect the countryside of the Gipping
Valley. To the west, any new development would be on rising ground
in a prominent and exposed landscape position. The road network
within Needham Market is also a constraint, particularly the substandard
junctions with the High Street. The historic importance of the
High Street, which forms part of the designated conservation area,
limits the opportunities for road or junction improvements.
2.3.24
During the Plan period only a modest amount of housing will take
place at Needham Market with a proposal to allocate land at Hill
House Farm which involves the redevelopment of a farm complex.
This will meet local provision for housing whilst large scale development
can best be met at nearby Stowmarket. The District Planning Authority
will prepare a development brief for this proposal, to incorporate
a new landscaped edge to the town.
|
Limited scope for growth at Needham
Market. |
PROPOSAL
2:
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, IS IDENTIFIED ON LAND AT
HILL HOUSE FARM, NEEDHAM MARKET. (1.3
HECTARES) (INSET MAP 55A)
|
|
2.3.25 Eye is a market
town serving the rural heartland of the District. The historic layout
of the town around the castle mound remains largely intact. The
town centre is designated as a conservation area. The surrounding
countryside is in the flood plain of the Dove Valley which is a
Special Landscape Area, and most new development has taken place
on higher ground to the north.
2.3.26
Further housing and employment development at Eye needs to take
account of the proximity of Diss in Norfolk. Norfolk County
Structure Plan includes Diss as one of the locations
for additional development in the period up to 2006.
2.3.27 Eye has grown slowly in recent years with an average increase
of six dwellings per year in the 1970's and 10 dwellings per year
in the 1980's. With the recent expiry of an outline planning consent
for residential development off Victoria Hill, Eye, a further allocation
is considered necessary to maintain recent building rates and to
reflect the District Planning Authority's wish to see new dwellings
sited near to future centres of employment. Of the sites put forward
in the Local Plan process, the Victoria Hill site remains the preferred
location for further development in Eye. Housing requirements at
Eye will be reviewed during the Plan period as proposed industrial
development at Eye Airfield takes place. |
Maintaining present levels of housing growth
at Eye.
|
PROPOSAL
3:
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROVIDING FOR UP TO 50 DWELLINGS
IS IDENTIFIED ON LAND AT REAR OF HOUSES, VICTORIA HILL (EAST
SIDE),
EYE.
(1.9 HECTARES) (INSET MAP 30) |
|
2.3.28 Debenham is a small town at the head of
the Deben Valley. The town acts as a service centre for the surrounding
villages but this role has reduced with the growth in car ownership
taking people to other shopping centres. Debenham continues to be
an attractive place to live with a range of shops, a High School,
community centre and leisure centre. |
Continuing small
scale growth at Debenham to meet local needs.
|
2.3.29
There has been steady housing growth at Debenham over the period
1971 to 1991, averaging 16 dwellings per year. Most of the development
has taken place to the west of the town's historic core, which
is designated as a conservation area. The scale of housing development
has been, and will continue to be, limited by the capacity of the
local road system and the need to protect the special character
of the town.
2.3.30
The Local Plan allows for modest growth over the Plan period to
meet local housing needs by allocating land for development south
of Sackvylle Street. The site is in a prominent position on the
southern approach to Debenham and there will be a need for extensive
landscaping and provision of public open space. The District Planning
Authority will therefore prepare a development brief for this proposal.
An initial phase of development providing 50 dwellings on 2.1 hectares
is intended to take place during the Plan period. The remaining
3.3 hectares will provide landscaping, public open space and the
later phases of the housing development. |
|
PROPOSAL
4:
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, INITIALLY PROVIDING FOR UP TO
50 DWELLINGS, IS IDENTIFIED ON LAND SOUTH OF SACKVYLLE STREET,
DEBENHAM.
(5.4
HECTARES) (INSET MAP 25) |
|
Villages |
|
2.3.31
Villages within the Plan area have been defined by Settlement
Boundaries. Each has a character of its own with its size
and form often different from other villages nearby. In some parishes,
for example Norton and Worlingworth, as well as defining the main
part of the village, groups or clusters of housing outside the
village are also defined by means of settlement boundaries. In
other parishes there are scattered groups of dwellings but no recognisable
built-up area, in which case no settlement boundary has been identified.
The definition of settlements for the purposes of the Local Plan
has to be concerned with the physical form and size of villages
and the application of planning policy. It does not necessarily
reflect the social or historical identity of particular places
or parishes. |
The pattern and form of villages needs to
be protected if Mid Suffolk's character is to be retained.
|
2.3.32 There has been particular pressure
for housing development in villages close to the major towns of
Ipswich, Bury St. Edmunds and Diss. In these villages there has
been a strong market demand for commuter housing
with people travelling into the towns to work. Estate development
has taken place and in some cases, there are planning permissions
for further estates. |
Providing for housing needs across
the Plan area.
|
2.3.33 The Local Plan needs to relate the
scale of housing development to the ability of a village to absorb
development without adversely affecting its character, residential
amenity, or the surrounding countryside. The likelihood of increased
car borne commuter development, harmful effects on road safety and
the availability of services and facilities also need to be taken
into account. |
|
2.3.34 Further development in the form
of estates will normally be permitted only on sites identified in
the Local Plan. Provision has been made for some estate development
in a number of the larger villages to meet the Plan's housing requirements
to the year 2006. This provision is in the form of modest allocations
in a number of villages having a range of services and facilities,
which may include public transport, rather than selecting one or
two villages for major growth. The list in Proposal 5 has been reduced
following the grant of planning permission as described in the note
below. |
|
PROPOSAL
5:
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING UP TO 140 DWELLINGS,
IS IDENTIFIED AT THE FOLLOWING VILLAGES:-
LIME QUARRY SITE, CHURCH LANE, CLAYDON
(6.0 HECTARES) (INSET MAP 18) LAND
AT REEDS WAY, STOWUPLAND
(1.2 HECTARES) (INSET MAP 74) |
|
Note: Site constraints
and development guidelines, are set out for each of the allocated
sites. See Implementation Schedules, published separately
as Supplementary Planning Guidance. Allocations included under
Proposal 9 in the Deposit Draft, at Beyton, Claydon (Exeter
Road) and Coddenham have subsequently been granted planning
permission. Sites at Ringshall Stocks and Wetheringsett, previously
allocated under Proposal 5, have been deleted. |
|
|
2.3.35
The Local Plan's policy for housing in villages is to protect the
character and amenity of settlements whilst allowing small-scale
incremental growth over the Plan period to create local opportunities
for meeting housing needs. Special considerations for affordable
housing are set out in the Written Statement (see Policies
H4 and H5).
|
Allowing small-scale development but only where appropriate.
|
2.3.36
Opportunities exist for small-scale development either by infill
or small groups of up to five dwellings within Settlement Boundaries
but village cramming will be resisted
and important amenity and open spaces will be protected. The cumulative
effect of infill development within a village needs to be considered
and very limited development abutting the Settlement Boundary and
well related to the existing pattern and form of the built up area
may be permitted if there are no longer other opportunities for
housing development within the Settlement Boundary. |
|
2.3.37
This approach by the District Planning Authority is intended to
allow for a small number of houses to sustain village communities
over the Plan period. It is not open to abuse by speculative development
which is unrelated to the needs of the local community, nor should
this stance conflict with the ability to provide land abutting
settlement boundaries for affordable housing. This topic is considered
further in paragraphs 2.3.39 - 2.3.52 below. |
|
2.3.38
Whilst local communities tend to support small-scale housing over
a period of years to meet local needs, there has been concern at
the introduction in or abutting villages of estate-like development
which has been out of scale and character with its surroundings.
The District Planning Authority regard this type of development
as being contrary to the principle of sustainable growth. In the
villages of the Plan area where a range of services and facilities
exist, new housing in the form of groups of up to five dwellings,
served off a single access, will often provide a more acceptable
type of development. |
Relating the scale of housing development
to its environmental setting.
|
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT IN VILLAGES
POLICY
H3
WITHIN
SETTLEMENT BOUNDARIES, APPLICATIONS FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
WILL BE CONSIDERED IN RELATION TO THE APPEARANCE AND CHARACTER
OF
THE VILLAGE, THE EFFECT ON NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AMENITY AND
HIGHWAY SAFETY, THE AVAILABILITY OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES AND
POLICIES
FOR THE PROTECTION OF VISUALLY IMPORTANT OPEN SPACES AND
THE SURROUNDING COUNTRYSIDE
-
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SETTLEMENT BOUNDARIES OF VILLAGES
WILL NORMALLY TAKE THE FORM OF:-
-
THE INFILLING OF SMALL UNDEVELOPED SITES, UNLESS IT IS DESIRABLE
TO RETAIN A SITE IN UNDEVELOPED FORM AS AN IMPORTANT AMENITY
OR OPEN SPACE IN THE VILLAGE SCENE; OR
-
A SMALL GROUP OF DWELLINGS, UP TO 5 IN NUMBER, WELL RELATED TO
ITS SURROUNDINGS AND THE CHARACTER OF THE VILLAGE; OR
-
IN THOSE VILLAGES, WHERE A WIDER RANGE OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES
EXIST, GROUPS OF UP TO 9 DWELLINGS WELL RELATED TO EACH OTHER
AND THE CHARACTER OF THEIR SURROUNDINGS.
IN
VILLAGES, HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE FORM OF ESTATES OF 10 DWELLINGS
OR MORE WILL BE PERMITTED ONLY ON SITES ALLOCATED IN THE LOCAL
PLAN. |
|
Affordable Housing |
|
2.3.39
In many parts of Mid Suffolk there are particular difficulties
in securing an adequate supply of affordable housing for
local needs. House prices, particularly in villages, have often
been beyond the financial reach of local people on modest incomes.
The problem became acute with the rapid rise in house prices in
East Anglia during the late 1980's. Average earnings in Suffolk
continue to be below the level for East Anglia and for Great Britain.
Whilst terms such as social housing and low
cost housing have also been used to describe types
of development that specially target locally generated needs, the
Local Plan adopts the term 'affordable housing' in line with Government
policy guidance. The definition of affordable housing is
set out below:- |
Defining what
is meant by affordable housing for local
needs.
|
2.3.40
Affordable Housing comprises:
(a)
Low-cost market housing which, because of its small size, design
and layout (eg. flats or tight knit housing which physically cannot
be extended or for which rights to extend have been removed) will
remain at the least expensive end of the housing market. The provision
of this form of housing which will usually result from negotiations
with the developer of an allocated housing site, or a large windfall
site, will not necessarily need legal safeguards to ensure its
continued availability. By its physical nature it will remain relatively
affordable.
(b)
Subsidised housing, which may be provided as a result of negotiations
with developers of allocated housing sites working in conjunction
with a social landlord, or through the mechanism of the 'rural
exceptions' provision, on unallocated sites in or adjoining rural
settlements. Such housing will require safeguards in the form
of an agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990, or a similar legal agreement, to ensure its availability
to successive eligible occupiers.
|
|
2.3.41 There are no fixed national criteria
for assessing local needs housing; much will depend on the local
housing market and on local economic and social considerations.
The annual Housing Strategy Statement produced by the District Council
in conjunction with the Housing Investment Programme sets out the
latest information on housing needs and resources in the District,
and takes into account the need for affordable housing. In
terms of this Local Plan, provision for affordable housing in villages,
under the provision of rural exceptions, will be regarded as additional
to the provision made for general housing needs as identified in
Table 2, Mid Suffolk Housing Requirements 1992-2006. This
is because the release of sites for an exceptional use of
land in rural areas would not normally be for general housing.
The situation will be monitored to ensure there is balanced provision
throughout the Plan area. |
Releasing sites foraffordable housing
as an exceptional use of land. |
2.3.42 The Government makes clear in its
planning policy guidance that a community's need for affordable
housing is a material consideration which the District Planning
Authority can take into account in deciding whether to grant planning
permission. This is particularly relevant when the District Planning
Authority is deciding applications for the development of small
sites which this Local Plan would not otherwise allocate for housing
within or adjoining villages.
2.3.43 The Government also states that the District Planning Authority
may reasonably seek to negotiate with developers for the inclusion
of an element of affordable housing in schemes, both on sites allocated
for housing and on other windfall sites. Circular 13/96 advises
that such an approach should only be applied to suitable sites in
settlements with a population of 3,000 or fewer to developments
of 25 or more dwellings, or to any residential site of one or more
hectares irrespective of the number of dwellings, and elsewhere
to developments of 30 or more dwellings or residential sites of
1.5 hectares or more. |
A community's need for affordable
housing is a material planning consideration.
|
Note: Revised Circular 6/98 changes the general definition
of suitable sites to developments of 25 or more dwellings
or sites of 1 hectare or more. |
|
|
2.3.44
The District Council, in its Housing Strategy, has set a target
for new affordable/rented housing of 80 dwellings per year, based
on an assessment of housing needs and the available resources.
Since 1991 Housing Associations have developed all the social housing
for rent in Mid Suffolk, with the District Council acting in an
enabling role. 197 dwellings have been built between 1991 and 1994,
an average of 66 per year. Nearly half of these, about 30 per year,
have been built on Council owned land. |
|
2.3.45
Council owned land is a fast diminishing resource and most of the
remaining land is not in the areas of priority housing need. In
order to maintain a social housing programme approaching 80 dwellings
per year another source of low cost land or housing will be needed.
The policy for negotiating with developers for an element of affordable
housing on larger housing schemes under Policy H4, offers the main
alternative.
2.3.46
If this policy is to provide at least 20 dwellings per year (ie.
about 200 dwellings over the Plan period), in order to compensate
for the lack of Council owned land, this would represent about
15 percent of the dwellings expected to be developed on sites allocated
in the Local Plan. For this reason, negotiations with developers
would be expected to take 15 percent as a starting point. |
|
2.3.47 Negotiations with developers would
also have to take account of market and site conditions. There may
be competing claims for contributions to the costs of roads, infrastructure,
community facilities etc. to enable development to take place. Planning
Policy Guidance Note No. 3 advises that where an element of low
cost housing provision is appropriate, its precise scale will vary
from case to case and Local Plan policies on this issue must be
reasonably flexible. |
|
2.3.48 Since planning conditions
and obligations cannot normally be used
to impose restrictions on tenure, price or ownership, the District
Planning Authority will need to satisfy itself before granting planning
permission that other secure arrangements have been made to ensure
the benefit of affordable housing will be enjoyed by successive
as well as by initial occupiers of the property. Normally the best
way to ensure that affordable housing will be enjoyed by successive
occupiers is to involve a housing association or a village trust
in the future management of the scheme.
2.3.49 In the case of planning applications for exceptional permission
for affordable housing abutting a settlement boundary, prospective
developers will be encouraged to undertake their own questionnaire
survey to show local needs for housing, preferably in conjunction
with the appropriate Parish Council, and findings should be easily
verified. A suitable questionnaire is available from the Mid Suffolk
District Council Housing Section. Developers will be required to demonstrate
a form of development most appropriate to suit the needs identified
in the survey and in this respect close liaison with the District
Council's Housing Section will provide a useful exchange of information. |
Securing arrangements to ensure
the benefits of affordable housing pass to usccessive occupiers.
|
2.3.50 Policy H5 below sets out the terms
by which an exceptional permission may be granted for affordable
housing, in the countryside on land abutting a settlement boundary. |
|
2.3.51 Local need
is defined for the purposes of affordable housing as:-
The requirement of an individual or family to live within a particular
part of Mid Suffolk who cannot afford to buy or rent housing appropriate
for their needs in the prevailing free housing market. In particular
they would include:-
- existing residents needing separate accommodation in the area
such as single people, newly married couples, disabled people
and people leaving tied accommodation on retirement
- people with the offer of a job in the locality, or whose work
provides important local services and who need to live close to
a particular village
- people who are not necessarily resident locally but have long
standing links with the local community such as elderly people
wishing to move back to a village to be near relatives
- persons or households on the District Council's housing waiting
list.
|
|
2.3.52 Circular 13/96 'Planning and Affordable
Housing' advises that where occupancy criteria are included as part
of conditions or planning obligations, a cascade approach may be preferable.
This should ensure that occupants will always be found for any accommodation,
thus safeguarding an adequate stream of revenue for those managing
the development (and thus enabling loans to be raised for the development),
whilst ensuring that people in local housing need take priority. Under
this approach the eligibility criteria would, initially be restricted
to local residents, people employed locally or people with local connections.
If the housing remained unallocated after a certain time the criteria
would widen (eg. to include neighbouring local planning authority
areas) to ensure that a suitable occupant was found. |
|
Note: Revised Circular 6/98 'Planning and Affordable
Housing' retains the same advice. |
|
|
PROVISION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN
LARGER SCHEMES
POLICY H4
A COMMUNITY'S NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS A MATERIAL
PLANNING CONSIDERATION. CONSEQUENTLY, ON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SITES
ALLOCATED AT STOWMARKET, DEBENHAM, EYE, CLAYDON AND STOWUPLAND,
(AND ON ANY UNALLOCATED SITES IN TOWNS AND VILLAGES WHICH MEET THE
SIZE CRITERIA SET OUT IN THE SUPPORTING TEXT AT PARAGRAPH 2.3.27b)
THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL, WHERE APPROPRIATE, SEEK THE
INCLUSION OF AN ELEMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. TO PREVENT THE LOSS
OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO THE GENERAL HOUSING MARKET, THE DISTRICT
PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL, WHERE APPROPRIATE, EXPECT LONG TERM SAFEGUARDS
TO BE IN PLACE TO ENSURE THE BENEFIT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WILL
BE ENJOYED BY SUCCESSIVE OCCUPIERS. THIS WILL NORMALLY BE SECURED
BY AN AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 106 OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING
ACT 1990. |
|
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
POLICY H5
IN ORDER TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR LOCAL PEOPLE
WHO ARE UNABLE TO COMPETE FOR PROPERTY IN THE GENERAL HOUSING MARKET,
THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY MAY, AS AN EXCEPTION TO NORMAL PLANNING
POLICY, GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ABUTTING
THE SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY FO A TOWN OR A VILLAGE WHERE ADEQUATE FACILITIES
ARE AVAILABLE.
TO BE ACCEPTABLE, PROPOSALS SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT A
LOCAL NEED EXISTS WHICH CANNOT BE MET BY APPLYING NORMAL PLANNING
POLICY. ANY APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHOULD BE ACCOMPANIED
BY A DETAILED SURVEY OF LOCAL HOUSING NEED AND THE ACCOMMODATION
PROPOSED SHOULD CONTRIBUTE TO MEETING THIS PROVEN NEED.
TO PREVENT THE LOSS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO THE GENERAL
HOUSING MARKET, THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL EXPECT LONG
TERM SAFEGUARDS TO BE INTRODUCED TO ENSURE THE BENEFIT OF AFFORDABLE
HOUSING WILL BE ENJOYED BY SUCCESSIVE OCCUPIERS. THIS WILL NORMALLY
REQUIRE AN AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 106 OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING
ACT 1990. |
|
Note: This policy allows for affordable
housing on sites released as an exception to normal policies
for housing provision. Schemes involving cross subsidy do
not fall within the terms of this policy. Planning Policy
Guidance Note 3 makes it clear that mixed developments, consisting
partly of high value housing used to offset a lower return
on low cost housing on the same site, would not be appropriate
in rural areas. |
|
|
Providing for Adequate Land Availability |
|
2.3.53 Sufficient land must be genuinely
available for Mid Suffolk's housing requirements, as identified
in Table 2, if the Local Plan's policies and proposals
are to be carried forward effectively. Housing sites allocated in
the Local Plan must continue to be free from planning, physical
and ownership constraints and must be suitable for a range of house
types which the housing market requires. The District Planning Authority
will monitor the take-up of housing land within the Plan area in
conjunction with Suffolk County Council and the House Builders'
Federation.
|
An immediate five year supply of housing land.
|
2.3.54
The phasing of housing development may be justified where it relates
to infrastructure or the adequacy of services indicating that a
site cannot be released for development until a particular stage
in the Plan period. Evidence that market demand would totally exhaust
planned housing provision in the early years of the Plan may also
indicate a need for some overall phasing of development. This situation
will be kept under review. The only area where phasing, related
to provision of infrastructure, has been introduced is for the
major housing development at Stowmarket on land between the railway
and the A14 Trunk Road (see Proposal 26 and Proposal 27)
as discussed in Section 2.10.
|
|
A
REGULAR SUPPLY OF HOUSING LAND
POLICY
H6
THE
DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL SEEK TO ENSURE THAT THE GRANTING
OR RENEWAL OF PERMISSIONS FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING LAND
ALLOCATED FOR HOUSING IN THE LOCAL PLAN IS SUCH THAT AT LEAST
A FIVE YEAR SUPPLY OF HOUSING LAND IS AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE
LIFETIME OF THE PLAN.
SUBJECT
TO MONITORING THE TAKE UP OF HOUSING LAND, PHASING MAY BE INTRODUCED
TO ENSURE NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE OR SERVICES ARE IN PLACE BEFORE
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IS COMMENCED.
|
|
Housing in the Countryside |
|
2.3.55
New housing will continue to be required in rural areas and the
Local Plan has made provision through its policies for housing
in villages and for affordable homes. The Government's planning
policy guidance states that new house building away from established
settlements should be strictly controlled, that whilst a single
house on a particular site might be unobtrusive, this is not by
itself a good reason for granting planning permission because it
could be repeated too often. This would be to the overall detriment
of the countryside which needs protecting for its own sake and
to conserve its resources. To clarify
the position within this Local Plan, all land outside settlement
boundaries is classified as the countryside. This includes
dispersed groups of dwellings which are not large enough to be
considered as settlements. Isolated new houses in the countryside
will require special justification.
2.3.56
There are a number of situations in which houses in the open
countryside may be permitted as an exception to normal policies
for the provision
of housing such as replacement dwellings and conversions. |
|
2.3.57 Replacement
Dwellings in the Countryside - There may be situations
where the replacement of an existing dwelling in the countryside
would be acceptable. For example, where a cottage has been without
occupants for a number of years and has fallen into disrepair,
and the options to bring the building back into use are substantial
modernisation or replacement. Provided that no highway safety
problems arise from the proposal the replacement of an existing
dwelling in the countryside will normally be acceptable. Proposals
will also be subject to design considerations including the comparative
size of the new dwelling in relation to the original dwelling
and its setting in the countryside. Where a proposal involves
a substantial increase in size and scale from the existing dwelling
and its curtilage, it will be treated as a new dwelling house
in the countryside. Policy H8 explains that there will be strict
control over new housing development unrelated to the needs of
the countryside.
|
Replacing dwellings
that have fallen into disrepair. |
2.3.58 Re-Use and Adaptation of
Rural Buildings for Residential Purposes - The Government's
planning policy guidance for the re-use of buildings is
set out in The Countryside Environmental Quality and Economic
and Social Development (PPG7). It makes the point that
new housing in the open countryside is subject to strict control
and that applications for changes to residential use should be viewed
with particular care. Proposals for the conversion of existing rural
buildings to dwellings may be inappropriate, especially where such
buildings are unsuitable for conversion without significant alteration,
rebuilding or extension. In addition the creation of a residential
curtilage around a newly converted building can sometimes have a
harmful effect on the character of the countryside. Residential
conversions have minimal benefit for the rural economy whereas commercial
uses can often provide local services and employment.
RESTRICTING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNRELATED TO THE NEEDS OF THE
COUNTRYSIDE
POLICY H7
IN THE INTERESTS OF PROTECTING THE EXISTING CHARACTER
AND APPEARANCE OF THE COUNTRYSIDE, OUTSIDE SETTLEMENT BOUNDARIES
THERE WILL BE STRICT CONTROL OVER PROPOSALS FOR NEW HOUSING. THE
PROVISION OF NEW HOUSING WILL NORMALLY FORM PART OF EXISTING SETTLEMENTS.
REPLACEMENT DWELLINGS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
POLICY H8
IN THE COUNTRYSIDE AN APPLICATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT
OF AN EXISTING DWELLING BY A NEW DWELLING WILL BE CONSIDERED ON
ITS MERITS. FAVOURABLE CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN PROVIDED THAT
THE PROPOSAL, BY VIRTUE OF ITS SIZE AND SCALE, DOES NOT DETRACT
FROM THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF ITS SURROUNDINGS, ITS LANDSCAPE
SETTING, OR CONTINUE A TRAFFIC HAZARD.
CONVERSION OF RURAL BUILDINGS TO DWELLINGS
POLICY H9
IN THE COUNTRYSIDE, THE CONVERSION AND CHANGE OF USE OF
AGRICULTURAL AND OTHER RURAL BUILDINGS WHOSE FORM, BULK AND GENERAL
DESIGN ARE IN KEEPING WITH THEIR SURROUNDINGS, WILL BE FAVOURABLY
CONSIDERED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:-
- THE PROPOSED CONVERSION MUST RESPECT THE STRUCTURE,
FORM AND CHARACTER OF THE ORIGINAL BUILDING AND RETAIN ANY IMPORTANT
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. EXISTING OPENINGS SHOULD BE UTILISED WHEREVER
PRACTICABLE AND NEW OPENINGS KEPT TO A MINIMUM;
- WHERE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS ARE ESSENTIAL THEY SHOULD
NOT DOMINATE THE ORIGINAL BUILDING IN EITHER SCALE, USE OF MATERIALS
OR SITUATION. PROPOSED EXTENSIONS SHOULD NOT DETRACT FROM THE
APPEARANCE OR CHARACTER WHICH WARRANTS THE ORIGINAL BUILDING BEING
RETAINED AS A FEATURE IN THE COUNTRYSIDE. DOMESTIC FEATURES, SUCH
AS PORCHES AND CHIMNEY STACKS, UNRELATED TO THE TRADITIONAL APPEARANCE
OF THE BUILDING WILL BE CONSIDERED INAPPROPRIATE. THE CREATION
OF A RESIDENTIAL CURTILAGE AROUND A NEWLY CONVERTED BUILDING SHOULD
NOT IMPOSE ADVERSELY ON THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING COUNTRYSIDE;
- THE EXTENT TO WHICH ANY RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION DETRACTS
FROM THE ORIGINAL CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING OR ITS RURAL SURROUNDINGS
WILL BE TREATED AS A MATERIAL CONSIDERATION. IN ORDER TO PROTECT
THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE CONVERTED BUILDING OR THE
AMENITY AND APPEARANCE OF THE SURROUNDING COUNTRYSIDE THE DISTRICT
PLANNING AUTHORITY MAY IMPOSE CONDITIONS REMOVING PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
RIGHTS UNDER THE GENERAL PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1995.
|
Care needs to be taken if proposals
for conversions to residential use are to be acceptable. |
Note 1: Alternative forms of conversion
for uses which generate employment are preferred by the District
Planning Authority, as explained in Policies CL18, E11 and
RT16. This policy should also be read in conjunction with
Policies HB3 and HB5 which deal with converting historic buildings
and Policy CL8 which seeks the preservation of habitat for
protected species. |
|
|
Note 2: In considering proposals for
the conversion of rural buildings, the District Planning Authority
will have regard to advice set out in Annex G of Department
of the Environment's Planning Policy Guidance Note 7, The
Countryside - Environmental Quality and Economic and Social
Development. |
|
|
Accommodation for Agricultural or Forestry Workers |
|
2.3.59 One
of the few circumstances in which isolated residential development
in the Countryside may be justified is when accommodation is required
to enable farm or forestry workers to live at or in the immediate
vicinity of their place of work. Normally it will be as convenient
for such workers to live in nearby towns or villages. This may
well have domestic and social advantages as well as avoiding potentially
intrusive development in the countryside. |
Agricultural
worker's dwellings in the countryside. |
2.3.60
Whether a new dwelling for an agricultural worker is essential
in any particular case will depend on the needs of the farm enterprise
concerned and not on the personal preferences or circumstances
of the individuals involved. The District Planning Authority will
need to satisfy itself that intentions to engage in farming or
forestry are genuine and are capable of being sustained for a reasonable
period of time. The occupation of such dwellings will be controlled
by conditions attached to any planning permission. Applicants should
substantiate their proposals with evidence of an essential need
through an appraisal carried out by the Agricultural Development
and Advisory Service (ADAS) or another similar advisory
body. |
|
DWELLINGS FOR KEY AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
POLICY
H10
IN
THE COUNTRYSIDE, DWELLINGS FOR KEY AGRICULTURAL PERSONNEL WILL
BE PERMITTED ONLY WHERE IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO THE SATISFACTION
OF THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY THAT THERE IS A PROVEN ESSENTIAL
AND IMMEDIATE AGRICULTURAL NEED FOR A DWELLING ON THE HOLDING
IN RESPECT OF WHICH PERMISSION FOR A PARTICULAR SITE IS SOUGHT.
WHERE
IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICT PLANNING
AUTHORITY THAT IT IS ESSENTIAL FOR AN AGRICULTURAL WORKER'S DWELLING
TO BE LOCATED IN THE COUNTRYSIDE, SUCH A DWELLING SHOULD NORMALLY
BE SITED IN ASSOCIATION WITH EXISTING FARM BUILDINGS AND ITS
IMPACT ON THE LANDSCAPE MINIMISED.
IN
PERMITTING SUCH PROPOSALS THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL
NORMALLY REDUCE THE STANDARD TIME LIMIT FOR THE DURATION OF THE
PERMISSION AND IMPOSE AN OCCUPANCY RESTRICTION ON THE ACCOMMODATION. |
|
Residential Caravans and Other Mobile Homes |
|
2.3.61
Residential caravans can provide a less costly and more flexible
alternative to permanent housing, especially where short term accommodation
is need. Mobile homes can contribute to the provision of low cost
accommodation, as Planning Policy Guidance Note 3: Housing, states,
and Policies H4 and H5 make provision for affordable housing. Proposals
for mobile homes will be treated on their own planning merits.
Whilst in principle residential caravans or mobile homes would
normally be acceptable on sites which would be appropriate for
permanent dwellings, the District Planning Authority will need
to take account of their visual impact on the surrounding area.
|
Planning permission on a temporary basis
for residential caravans.
|
RESIDENTIAL
CARAVANS AND OTHER MOBILE HOMES
POLICY
H11
PLANNING
PERMISSION WILL NOT NORMALLY BE GRANTED FOR RESIDENTIAL CARAVANS
OR MOBILE HOMES ON SITES WHICH WOULD NOT RECEIVE PLANNING PERMISSION
FOR PERMANENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. IN PARTICULAR THERE WILL
BE STRICT CONTROL OVER NEW RESIDENTIAL CARAVANS IN THE COUNTRYSIDE.
PLANNING
PERMISSION MAY BE GRANTED EXCEPTIONALLY FOR A RESIDENTIAL CARAVAN
WHERE A GENUINE SHORT TERM NEED HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WHERE
THERE IS NO ADVISE EFFECT ON THE CHARACTER, APPEARANCE AND AMENITY
OF ITS SURROUNDINGS OR HIGHWAY SAFETY. ANY PERMISSION WILL BE
OF A TEMPORARY NATURE AND WILL NOT BE RENEWED UNLESS RESTRICTED
TO THE PERSONS FOR WHOM THE NEED WAS IDENTIFIED.
|
|
Gypsy Sites |
|
2.3.62
Section 80(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
repealed Part II of the Caravan Sites Act 1968 (the duty of local
authorities to provide sites for gypsies), together with the definition
of 'gypsies' in Section 16 of the Caravan Sites Act. The statutory
definition, which defines gypsies as, inter alia, 'persons of nomadic
habit of life, whatever their race or origin', is inserted into
Section 24 (8) of the Caravan Sites and Control of Development
Act 1960. Policy guidance is to be found in Circulars 1/94 and
18/94, previous Circulars have been cancelled. |
|
2.3.63
There is a requirement to address the accommodation needs of gypsies,
and the District Planning Authority has opted for a criteria based
policy rather than allocating any specific site or sites. Under
the previous legislation Mid Suffolk was designated as part of
an area where adequate provision had been made for the accommodation
of gypsies. No immediate need to identify further gypsy sites in
Mid Suffolk is apparent, but it is necessary to include a policy
which will aid the identification of suitable sites to meet any
future need, by setting out criteria in the same way that many
other forms of development are dealt with in the Local Plan. These
include the effect on residential and visual amenity, highway considerations,
and the need to be within a reasonable distance of community facilities
and services. |
|
GYPSY
SITES
POLICY
H12
WHERE
A NEED FOR A CARAVAN SITE FOR GYPSIES (AS DEFINED BY SECTION
24(8) OF THE CARAVAN SITES AND CONTROL OF DEVELOPMENT ACT 1960)
CAN BE DEMONSTRATED PERMISSION WILL BE GIVEN PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING
CRITERIA ARE MET:
-
THERE IS NO MATERIAL HARM TO NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AMENITY OR TO
THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA;
-
THERE IS NO HARMFUL CONFLICT WITH OTHER POLICIES IN THE PLAN
DESIGNATED TO PROTECT THE COUNTRYSIDE, WILDLIFE, AND SITES OF
ARCHITECTURAL, ECOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE;
-
SATISFACTORY ACCESS CAN BE OBTAINED, AND ADEQUATE PARKING AND
TURNING AREAS PROVIDED FOR VEHICLES, INCLUDING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
WHERE APPROPRIATE;
-
THE SITE IS WITHIN A REASONABLE DISTANCE
OF LOCAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
WHERE
PERMISSION IS GIVEN IN RECOGNITION OF THE ACCOMMODATION NEEDS
OF THE GYPSY COMMUNITY, CONDITIONS WILL USUALLY BE IMPOSED RESTRICTING
THE USE OF THE SITE TO OCCUPATION BY GYPSIES AS DEFINED IN THE
ACT, AND LIMITING THE NUMBER OF CARAVANS LOCATED AT THE SITE.
LANDSCAPING CONDITIONS MAY ALSO BE IMPOSED. |
|
High Standards of Design for New Housing |
|
2.3.64
The appearance of a proposed development and its relationship to
its surroundings are material considerations; the District Planning
Authority will take them into account in reaching their decisions
on planning applications. Poor design that is out of scale and
character with its surroundings will be rejected. Applicants for
planning permission should demonstrate that they have considered
the wider setting of buildings. The appearance and treatment of
the spaces between and around buildings is also of great importance.
In considering proposals for new housing development, the District
Planning Authority will refer to the guidelines set out in the Suffolk
Design Guide for Residential Areas which has been adopted
by Mid Suffolk District Council as supplementary planning guidance. |
Practical guidance on design and layout is
contained in the Suffolk Design Guide for Residential Areas. |
2.3.65
Developers should aim for high quality design and landscaping in
all new housing development with a range of house types and sizes
to cater for the housing market. A well-designed scheme that respects
the local environment can do much to make new housing more acceptable
to the local community. Housing proposals need to have properly
considered the overall scale and density of the development; the
height and massing of its various elements; the layout of the scheme
and its landscaping; and access and parking arrangements. The final
scheme should be consistent with the scale and character of its
setting. |
New housing should enhance the quality of its surroundings.
|
Density |
|
2.3.66
Where new housing is acceptable, the character of a particular
settlement or neighbourhood should always be respected in terms
of proposed densities. Villages vary widely in their character
and what might be appropriate in a village with a dense and intricate
pattern of development could be out of place in a sparser, more
open settlement. The reverse may also be true. |
Development consistent with its environmental setting.
|
2.3.67
The Government's planning advice is that Local Plans can include
policies on densities for new housing in areas allocated for development.
The District Planning Authority recognises this will need to take
account of the characteristics of different sites and the need
for a range of house types at varying price levels. There will
be situations in rural areas where lower densities will be justified
by providing extensive areas of landscaping. In towns and larger
villages, higher densities may be justified on particular sites
to allow sustainable development near to public transport centres,
alongside corridors well served by public transport or for affordable
housing or sheltered accommodation for the elderly. |
|
2.3.68
To give an indication of how much land needs to be released for
general needs housing, the District Planning Authority has worked
to a net density in the range of 25-37 dwellings per hectare (or
10-15 dwellings per acre) for sites allocated in the Local Plan.
This allows for different densities on particular sites but clearly
indicates the importance attached to not wasting land in a manner
which conflicts with the principle of environmentally sustainable
growth. As an area well related to the town centre and public transport
network, the Stowmarket Strategic Development Area is considered
an appropriate location for higher density development. |
|
DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
POLICY H13
NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WILL BE EXPECTED TO ACHIEVE A HIGH
STANDARD OF DESIGN AND LAYOUT AND BE OF A SCALE AND DENSITY APPROPRIATE
TO THE SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS. PROPOSALS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SHOULD TAKE ACCOUNT OF THE FOLLOWING:-
- DESIGN AND LAYOUT SHOULD RESPECT THE CHARACTER OF THE
PROPOSAL SITE AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
TO ITS SURROUNDINGS;
- DESIGN SHOULD COMPLEMENT THE SCALE, FORM AND MATERIALS
OF TRADITIONAL BUILDING IN THE AREA;
- AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS SHOULD NOT BE UNDULY
AFFECTED BY REASON OF OVERLOOKING OR LOSS OF DAYLIGHT;
- DWELLINGS SHOULD HAVE ADEQUATE PRIVACY, SUFFICIENT
DAYLIGHTING AND SUNLIGHTING AND BE PROVIDED WITH PRIVATE AMENITY
SPACE OR GARDENS;
- LANDSCAPE FEATURES, INCLUDING HEDGES AND TREES, SHOULD
BE RETAINED UNLESS THIS IS IMPRACTICABLE OR UNNECESSARY;
- HISTORICAL, ECOLOGICAL OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF
A SITE SHOULD BE RETAINED UNLESS THIS IS IMPRACTICAL OR UNNECESSARY,
AND WHERE POSSIBLE ENHANCED;
- ROAD LAYOUTS SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO THE STANDARDS AND
REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY;
- ROAD LAYOUTS SHOULD REDUCE TRAFFIC SPEEDS IN RESIDENTIAL
AREAS AND PROVIDE FOR THE SAFETY OF PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS;
- DWELLINGS SHOULD HAVE SATISFACTORY ACCESS TO THE ADJACENT
HIGHWAY AND CAR PARKING PROVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED
PARKING STANDARDS OF THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY.
WHEN GRANTING PLANNING PERMISSION THE DISTRICT PLANNING
AUTHORITY MAY INCLUDE CONDITIONS TO SECURE THE SATISFACTORY PROVISION
OF A LANDSCAPING SCHEMES AND ITS SUBSEQUENT MAINTENANCE FOR A PERIOD
OF NOT LESS THAN 5 YEARS. |
|
Note: The provision of public open space and
amenity areas in housing development is set out in Policy RT4.
|
|
A RANGE OF HOUSE TYPES TO MEET DIFFERENT
ACCOMMODATION NEEDS
POLICY H14
IN NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, ON ESTATES DEVELOPMENT OF 10
OR MORE DWELLINGS, THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL ENCOURAGE
A VARIETY OF HOUSE TYPES AND DESIGNS TO CATER FOR DIFFERENT ACCOMMODATION
NEEDS, AND TO AVOID UNDUE UNIFORMITY. |
|
DEVELOPMENT TO REFLECT LOCAL CHARACTERISTICS
POLICY H15
PROPOSED NEW HOUSING SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PATTERN
AND FORM OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE NEIGHBOURING AREA, THE CHARACTER
OF ITS SETTING, PARTICULAR SITE CONSTRAINTS SUCH AS ACCESS AND DRAINAGE
AND THE CONFIGURATION OF THE SITE INCLUDING ITS NATURAL FEATURES.
ON SITES ALLOCATED IN THE LOCAL PLAN FOR NEW HOUSING IN
THE FORM OF ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY
WILL GENERALLY ENCOURAGE NET DENSITIES IN THE RANGE 25 -37 DWELLINGS
PER HECTARE (10-15 DWELLINGS PER ACRE).
|
|
Note: Net density in estate development
excludes social and community facilities, shops, areas required
to meet the landscaping and amenity requirements of the development,
other existing features to be retained, and roads (other than
immediate access roads) provided as part of the development. |
|
|
Securing Residential Amenity |
|
2.3.69 An
important part of planning control is to protect the amenity of
residential areas. Infilling, conversion and redevelopment within
built-up areas can make a useful contribution to meeting housing
needs. By adapting existing dwellings through conversion or extension,
the housing stock can meet changing accommodation needs. Sensitive
planning control should ensure the cumulative effect of this development
does not damage the character and amenity of established residential
areas.
2.3.70
Homes with large back gardens can be a feature of many towns and
villages. Sometimes it can be acceptable to develop back gardens
for new housing which is in keeping with the local environment,
but it will require careful planning. There must be a proper means
of access and adequate space between old and new buildings to avoid
spoiling the amenity of neighbouring houses. Tandem development,
consisting of one house immediately behind another and sharing
the same access is generally unsatisfactory because of the difficulties
of access to the house at the back and the disturbance and lack
of privacy suffered by the house in front. |
Avoiding development that materially
reduces residential amenity. |
2.3.71 Avoiding
House Building in areas with Reduced Amenity - there
are certain areas where it would be inappropriate to allow new
housing because of pollution or nuisance or where the future
safety of residents cannot be assured. Noise can affect health
and have a direct impact on local amenity. Its impact can therefore
be a material planning consideration. Noise from military flying
is noticeable in parts of East Anglia. Safeguarding zones and
sound contours have been defined by the Ministry of Defence for
some military establishments including Wattisham.
The District Planning Authority takes account of this information
in its decisions on the location of new housing. Smells, dust and
dirt are other forms of pollution which through planning control
need to be kept away from residential areas. |
Noise and other forms of pollution. |
2.3.72 The
Planning (Hazardous Substances) Act 1990 allows the
District Planning Authority to control the storage and use of
substances which could present major fire, explosion or toxic
hazards to people in the surrounding area. Housing should be
kept away from where substances of this type are stored. |
A precautionary approach in situations
where hazardous substances are present.
|
2.3.73 House
Extensions - the costs and inconvenience of moving have
made it increasingly common for householders to extend or adapt
their homes rather than move to another property. Most house
extensions are acceptable provided that their size, design and
the materials used are appropriate and neighbours' amenities
are not seriously affected. In most cases, particularly in the
countryside, large extensions to relatively small houses can
have a detrimental effect on their appearance and the character
of the surrounding area. |
Making sure house extensions pay
proper attention to neighbours' amenity.
|
PROTECTING EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AMENITY
POLICY H16
TO PROTECT THE EXISTING AMENITY AND CHARACTER OF PRIMARILY
RESIDENTIAL AREAS, THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL REFUSE:-
- CHANGE TO NON-RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE SUCH A CHANGE WOULD
MATERIALLY AND DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT THE CHARACTER AND AMENITY
OF THE AREA BY MEANS OF APPEARANCE, TRAFFIC GENERATION, NUISANCE
OR SAFETY;
- THE LOSS OF OPEN SPACES WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE CHARACTER
OR APPEARANCE OF AN AREA AND WHICH ARE IMPORTANT FOR RECREATION
OR AMENITY PURPOSES;
- DEVELOPMENT THAT MATERIALLY REDUCES THE AMENITY AND
PRIVACY OF ADJACENT DWELLINGS OR ERODES THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING
AREA. THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A SERIES OF PROPOSALS WILL BE TAKEN
INTO ACCOUNT.
KEEPING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AWAY FROM POLLUTION
POLICY H17
THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL REFUSE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO, OR ARE EXPECTED TO BECOME
AFFECTED BY, EXCESSIVE ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE OR WHICH WOULD BE EXPOSED
TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS FROM INDUSTRIAL OR OTHER PREMISES.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL NORMALLY BE REFUSED IN AREAS
WHICH HAVE, OR ARE LIKELY TO HAVE, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED AMENITY
OR SAFETY BY VIRTUE OF PROXIMITY TO:-
- NOISE, SMELL OR OTHER FORMS OF POLLUTION EMANATING
FROM NEARBY AGRICULTURAL OR OTHER PREMISES;
- INDUSTRIAL PREMISES OR OTHER INSTALLATIONS WHICH INVOLVE
THE USE, STORAGE OR HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.
|
|
Note: Anglian Water makes every effort
to reduce smell emissions from its Sewage Treatment Works.
Nevertheless the District Planning Authority will discourage
housing development in close proximity to Sewage Treatment
Works to avoid nuisance to future residents. |
|
|
EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING DWELLINGS
POLICY H18
APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING DWELLINGS WILL
BE APPROVED, PROVIDED THAT THEY:-
- ARE IN KEEPING WITH THE SIZE, DESIGN AND MATERIALS
OF THE EXISTING DWELLING;
- WILL NOT MATERIALLY OR DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT THE AMENITIES
OF NEIGHBOURS OR THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE AREA;
- WILL NOT RESULT IN OVER-DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CURTILAGE.
THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A NUMBER OF EXTENSIONS TO THE
EXISTING DWELLING WILL BE REGARDED AS A MATERIAL CONSIDERATION. |
|
Note: The existing dwelling is defined
as the building as it originally stood at 1st July 1948 or,
in the case of buildings constructed after this date, as first
built. |
|
|
Accommodation involving Special Family Needs |
|
2.3.74 Provision for special family needs,
such as the accommodation of elderly relatives or people with disabilities,
may require the alteration or extension of existing dwellings. Annexes
for this purpose should normally be physically part of or connected
to the original house and should not be regarded as a means of eventually
obtaining planning permission for separate accommodation. Applicants
will therefore normally be expected to enter into an agreement under
the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to ensure
physically separate households are not created. Separate vehicular
access will not normally be considered appropriate. Where proposals
involve historic buildings particular care will need to be paid
to the character and appearance of the listed building and its setting
(see Policy HB1 and Policy HB3). |
The needs of elderly relatives
or people with disabilities.
|
ACCOMMODATION FOR SPECIAL FAMILY NEEDS
POLICY H19
IN THE COUNTRYSIDE OR IN OTHER SITUATIONS WHERE A SEPARATE
DWELLING WOULD NORMALLY BE UNACCEPTABLE, THE SUBDIVISION OR EXTENSION
OF AN EXISTING DWELLING TO PROVIDE A SELF-CONTAINED RESIDENTIAL
ANNEX MAY BE PERMITTED TO MEET SPECIAL FAMILY NEEDS.
IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE DISTRICT PLANNING AUTHORITY
WILL NORMALLY EXPECT THE APPLICANT TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT UNDER
SECTION 106 OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 TO PREVENT
A SEPARATE DWELLING BEING CREATED WHICH IS UNRELATED TO THE SPECIAL
FAMILY NEEDS IDENTIFIED.
WHERE EXTENSIONS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET SPECIAL FAMILY NEEDS
THEY SHOULD BE MODEST IN SCALE AND IN KEEPING WITH THE ORIGINAL
DWELLING. |
|
Note: This policy should be read in
conjunction with Policy H18. |
|
|
Targets
to be monitored as part of the performance of the Local Plan
Housing
-
to ensure a 5 year supply of readily available land exists at
all times for general needs housing
-
to maximise the number of affordable homes provided as part of
larger housing schemes within towns and larger villages
-
to identify the number, type and location of affordable houses
built in the rural area compared to an assessment of local needs.
|
< Previous | ^ Top
| Next >
|